Free Web Hosting by Netfirms
Web Hosting by Netfirms | Free Domain Names by Netfirms

Adventure Travel Writer  

 

 

Home

Articles
by O'Neil

Blogs

Books for
Writers

Book Store

Break into
Travel Writing

Contests

Editorial Advice

FAQ

Features

Global
Volunteers

Learn to
Write Travel Articles 
    

Pyrenees Walks

Travel Newsletters

Travel Planning
Links

Websites
for Travel Writers

 

 

Resources Truth and Travel Writing
Interview cited in Travel Writing, See the World-Sell the Story

Bloomsbury Review

 

 


Truth in Travel Writing & Travel Memoir

Note: This interview was published in a slightly different form in the Bloomsbury Review, January-February 2000.

 Colin Thubron, the prize winning  (PEN Silver Pen Award, Thomas Cook Travel Award, Hawthornden Prize,) author who lives in London, reads from In Siberia (Harper Collins, 2000) to an assembly of spellbound professors at a conference on travel writing held at the University of Pennsylvania in 2001.

 

“We waded down its passageways as down a sewer,” Thubron reads.  “I lost count of the iron doors awash with stench, the grilles giving on to blackness.   Each dungeon was still fixed with twin wooden platforms bound in iron, and might have held forty prisoners. There were twenty such chambers in the basement alone.  Their walls were sheathed in ice.  Prisoners here, said Fedor (Thubron’s guide who knew a prisoner there), used to press the bodies of the dead against the walls to insulate themselves from the cold.” p. 273

 

Individuals in the audience tighten their flanks, others draw in breath, there’s a nervous cough.  We’re listening to Thubron describe his wintertime visit to desolate and decaying Stalin-era forced labor camps near Magadan in far eastern Siberia.   It is difficult to remember that Thubron wasn’t a prisoner in the transit camp, so bleak and painful is the word painting he recounts. 

 

There are travel writers aplenty in the marketplace today. Swathes of them are gathered at this conference to parse intention and impact of several centuries worth of travel narratives.  Some of them have written up their own travels.  Some publish scholarly accounts gleaned from the journals of long forgotten peregrinators. Most are English professors  who use the travel format to coax young writers to improve their writing -- travel writing has  found legitimacy with academia at last in English Composition 101.

 

The difference that separates Thubron from other practitioners in the genre, is that he digs deeper, knows the difference between fact based writing (non-fiction) and writing based on facts (fiction and creative “non-fiction”).  Whether a piece is literary or not doesn’t turn on the writer’s precision with truth.

 

Later in the conference I sought Thubron and tried to pin him down on truth in travel writing, an issue that buzzed during between-session parlays. The previous evening, another writer had read from his book,  a narrative larded with obviously imagined and embellished events, which he claimed was non-fiction travel writing.   One of the conferees had pointed out that all writing is invented, whether it is called fiction or non-fiction. Others complained  that the  author from  the make-it-up style of travel writing insulted the audience.

 

“We expect truth within the form.  I take exception when the reader expects truth and the writer purposefully distorts  the event,” Thubron said. “A postscript or an editor’s forward alerts readers that the writer is playing with images, but to present all as truth when whole sections are invented, that’s wrong.” 

 

“The caveat, of course, is that nothing written is truth,” said Thubron, joining his hands around a thick white mug at a table in the hotel’s dimly lit coffee shop. “Writers forget, they exclude information all the time, creating a parallel text to what actually happened.  When you work from notes, it’s the author’s choice.   No travel book is entirely truth in that sense.  But, when reality is so extraordinary, why invent?”

 

I asked the obvious: “How would a reader know when a writer invents material.”

“If a reader  knows the culture, when a writer invents, the scenes ring false.” 

 

“I really have to check facts out,” said Thubron. He worries that travel writers prolong myths and clichés. We talked about the issue of accepting hearsay when local knowledge may be the wrong information.  How writers have to check the facts in libraries. “People don’t mention what they don’t see.   They miss the things out there that might surprise them,” he said. “I may do too much analyzing. When I’m obsessed with a subject, I’m thinking how to get people to talk about it, how to describe the next landscape.”

 

 

- L. Peat O’Neil

 

---------

L. Peat O’Neil writes for National Geographic News, the Washington Post and other publications.  She is the author of “Travel Writing” published by Writer’s Digest Books.

 

 

                                                                                                                                                                         

 

 

 


Copyright © 1998-2011 Peat O'Neil.com
Last modified: March 23, 2008